-21.1%
ACHR vs ZETA
+272.3%
-293.4%
-67.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.7% | -1.2% | -4.5% | -5.3% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -0.1% | -2.6% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -12.1% | +10.5% | -22.6% | -14.9% |
| 3M | +3.4% | +44.3% | -40.9% | -8.7% |
| 6M | -15.6% | +59.4% | -75.1% | -28.6% |
| YTD | -26.9% | +49.5% | -76.3% | -37.5% |
| 1Y | -34.8% | +62.7% | -97.4% | -46.1% |
| All | -21.1% | +272.3% | -293.4% | -66.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling