+115.5%
ACHR vs NXT
+178.8%
-63.3%
-67.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +1.2% | -2.1% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -0.7% | -1.1% | +0.4% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +9.8% | -15.3% | +25.1% | +14.8% |
| 3M | -10.5% | -43.8% | +33.3% | +3.6% |
| 6M | -15.5% | -18.7% | +3.1% | -12.0% |
| YTD | -24.1% | -3.0% | -21.1% | -25.1% |
| 1Y | -32.4% | +22.7% | -55.2% | -36.8% |
| 3Y | -11.6% | +95.9% | -107.5% | -31.6% |
| All | +115.5% | +178.8% | -63.3% | +43.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling