+172.1%
ACGL vs NIO
-93.2%
+265.3%
-22.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -4.9% | +5.3% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -14.5% | +16.6% | +2.3% |
| 30D | +12.3% | -15.0% | +27.3% | +12.5% |
| 3M | +11.8% | -35.6% | +47.4% | +12.3% |
| 6M | +17.5% | -55.7% | +73.1% | +18.5% |
| YTD | +14.3% | -43.1% | +57.4% | +14.7% |
| 1Y | +18.2% | -53.5% | +71.7% | +18.9% |
| 3Y | +33.2% | -59.8% | +93.0% | +33.1% |
| All | +172.1% | -93.2% | +265.3% | +196.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling