+26.5%
ACGL vs NIO
-54.1%
+80.6%
-14.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.7% | +3.4% | -0.8% | +2.9% |
| 7D | +8.0% | -0.6% | +8.6% | +7.9% |
| 30D | +17.3% | -3.5% | +20.8% | +17.0% |
| 3M | +11.2% | -30.7% | +41.9% | +8.5% |
| 6M | +18.2% | -45.6% | +63.8% | +14.3% |
| YTD | +15.4% | -35.3% | +50.7% | +11.8% |
| 1Y | +26.5% | -53.9% | +80.4% | +20.3% |
| All | +26.5% | -54.1% | +80.6% | +20.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling