+178.1%
ACGL vs BBIO
+144.2%
+33.9%
-53.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | -0.1% | -2.3% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -2.4% | -0.6% | -2.8% |
| 30D | -2.8% | -11.5% | +8.7% | -2.1% |
| 3M | +6.8% | +11.0% | -4.2% | +6.0% |
| 6M | -1.5% | +14.4% | -15.9% | -2.6% |
| YTD | -0.2% | -2.3% | +2.0% | -0.6% |
| 1Y | +5.3% | +37.7% | -32.4% | +2.4% |
| 3Y | +30.3% | +163.1% | -132.9% | +19.1% |
| 5Y | +151.8% | +49.5% | +102.3% | +118.4% |
| All | +178.1% | +144.2% | +33.9% | +107.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling