+15.1%
ABNB vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+115.1%
-37.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | +4.0% | -6.8% | -2.8% |
| 7D | -7.4% | -4.1% | -3.3% | -7.5% |
| 30D | -8.2% | -22.7% | +14.6% | -8.3% |
| 3M | +29.1% | -62.5% | +91.6% | +30.3% |
| 6M | +26.6% | -99.5% | +126.0% | +24.6% |
| YTD | +25.0% | -99.7% | +124.7% | +22.4% |
| 1Y | +37.0% | -99.9% | +136.9% | +32.4% |
| All | +15.1% | -100.0% | +115.1% | +1.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling