+36.2%
ABNB vs UMC
+231.0%
-194.8%
-17.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -2.5% | +1.3% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -9.5% | +11.4% | -20.9% | -9.6% |
| 30D | -9.4% | +16.8% | -26.2% | -9.5% |
| 3M | +29.9% | +19.1% | +10.8% | +27.3% |
| 6M | +26.6% | +137.4% | -110.9% | +16.5% |
| YTD | +23.5% | +186.4% | -162.8% | +11.7% |
| All | +36.2% | +231.0% | -194.8% | +21.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling