+15.1%
ABNB vs PFGC
+61.7%
-46.6%
-37.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | -1.2% | -1.6% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -7.4% | -3.7% | -3.7% | -6.1% |
| 30D | -8.2% | -16.0% | +7.8% | -2.0% |
| 3M | +29.1% | -4.1% | +33.3% | +31.2% |
| 6M | +26.6% | +8.7% | +17.9% | +22.3% |
| YTD | +25.0% | +6.4% | +18.6% | +19.9% |
| 1Y | +37.0% | -8.4% | +45.4% | +40.8% |
| All | +15.1% | +61.7% | -46.6% | -14.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling