-5.2%
ABNB vs NIO
-92.1%
+86.9%
-60.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.7% | +5.9% | +5.7% | +10.3% |
| 7D | +15.6% | +5.6% | +10.0% | +14.3% |
| 30D | +18.3% | -4.2% | +22.5% | +19.5% |
| 3M | +25.3% | -26.3% | +51.6% | +34.1% |
| 6M | +35.8% | -42.5% | +78.4% | +52.6% |
| YTD | +40.0% | -33.5% | +73.5% | +49.6% |
| 1Y | +57.6% | -52.7% | +110.3% | +82.1% |
| 3Y | +60.8% | -57.5% | +118.2% | +71.6% |
| All | -5.2% | -92.1% | +86.9% | +39.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling