+52.0%
ABNB vs LII
-9.2%
+61.2%
-37.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.8% | +0.8% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +6.5% | -0.2% | +6.7% | +6.4% |
| 30D | +9.4% | -0.6% | +10.0% | +9.3% |
| 3M | +0.6% | -17.0% | +17.6% | +5.7% |
| 6M | +33.7% | -31.1% | +64.8% | +45.9% |
| YTD | +33.5% | -27.7% | +61.1% | +41.1% |
| 1Y | +48.8% | -26.2% | +75.0% | +55.9% |
| All | +52.0% | -9.2% | +61.2% | +34.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling