+44.0%
ABNB vs HTZ
-81.0%
+124.9%
-37.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.5% | -20.8% | +17.3% | -2.5% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -7.7% | +9.9% | +2.6% |
| 30D | +6.1% | -13.1% | +19.2% | +6.7% |
| 3M | +11.6% | +14.7% | -3.2% | +10.2% |
| 6M | +21.8% | -70.6% | +92.4% | +26.9% |
| YTD | +25.4% | -65.2% | +90.5% | +28.6% |
| 1Y | +38.9% | -73.2% | +112.1% | +44.4% |
| All | +44.0% | -81.0% | +124.9% | +56.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling