+55.5%
ABNB vs GLDM
-1.4%
+56.9%
-21.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -2.6% | +0.9% | -1.3% |
| 7D | +11.9% | +2.9% | +9.1% | +11.4% |
| 30D | +12.7% | -3.9% | +16.6% | +13.2% |
| 3M | +1.2% | -8.1% | +9.3% | +2.2% |
| 6M | +32.1% | -14.7% | +46.8% | +33.2% |
| YTD | +37.7% | -6.6% | +44.3% | +38.0% |
| 1Y | +55.5% | -2.1% | +57.5% | +54.5% |
| All | +55.5% | -1.4% | +56.9% | +54.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling