+56.8%
ABNB vs EPAM
-30.1%
+86.8%
-37.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.1% | -0.4% | +3.5% | +3.2% |
| 7D | -1.7% | +2.4% | -4.1% | -2.4% |
| 30D | +11.8% | +42.3% | -30.5% | -0.3% |
| 3M | +0.9% | +60.7% | -59.8% | -13.6% |
| 6M | +40.5% | +80.5% | -40.0% | +14.2% |
| YTD | +37.6% | -20.4% | +58.0% | +43.5% |
| 1Y | +54.1% | -9.6% | +63.7% | +53.7% |
| 3Y | +56.8% | -30.5% | +87.2% | +53.1% |
| All | +56.8% | -30.1% | +86.8% | +53.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling