+38.1%
ABBV vs NIO
-51.1%
+89.2%
-15.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +0.6% | +0.1% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +1.5% | +6.9% | -5.4% | +1.5% |
| 30D | +6.7% | -4.7% | +11.5% | +6.7% |
| 3M | +19.9% | -28.1% | +48.0% | +20.0% |
| 6M | +47.5% | -41.7% | +89.2% | +47.9% |
| YTD | +32.2% | -33.1% | +65.3% | +31.6% |
| All | +38.1% | -51.1% | +89.2% | +35.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling