+87.8%
AAPL vs ZM
+33.5%
+54.2%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | +0.1% | +1.6% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -5.7% | +9.5% | +5.0% |
| 30D | +9.9% | -9.1% | +19.0% | +11.7% |
| 3M | +12.5% | +3.5% | +9.0% | +11.0% |
| 6M | +27.6% | +25.7% | +2.0% | +19.6% |
| YTD | +22.6% | +10.8% | +11.8% | +17.2% |
| 1Y | +45.0% | +12.8% | +32.2% | +37.5% |
| 3Y | +87.8% | +33.1% | +54.6% | +68.3% |
| All | +87.8% | +33.5% | +54.2% | +68.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling