+94.8%
AAPL vs Z
-19.0%
+113.8%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | Z | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | +1.7% | +0.4% | +1.8% |
| 7D | +1.8% | -13.1% | +14.8% | +4.0% |
| 30D | +4.3% | +5.9% | -1.6% | +3.0% |
| 3M | +16.6% | -13.7% | +30.3% | +18.6% |
| 6M | +21.6% | -27.1% | +48.7% | +26.6% |
| YTD | +31.2% | -56.8% | +88.0% | +47.9% |
| 1Y | +29.6% | -60.2% | +89.8% | +48.0% |
| All | +94.8% | -19.0% | +113.8% | +100.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside Z.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus Z return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × Z return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded Z wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling