+95.3%
AAPL vs PHM
+59.3%
+36.0%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PHM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +0.1% | +0.3% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +4.1% | -4.1% | +8.3% | +5.1% |
| 30D | +4.0% | +16.1% | -12.2% | +0.5% |
| 3M | +16.8% | -2.5% | +19.3% | +17.2% |
| 6M | +19.4% | +12.9% | +6.5% | +15.4% |
| YTD | +31.5% | +9.0% | +22.5% | +27.4% |
| 1Y | +31.0% | +8.2% | +22.8% | +26.9% |
| 3Y | +95.3% | +58.4% | +36.8% | +70.5% |
| All | +95.3% | +59.3% | +36.0% | +70.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PHM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PHM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PHM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PHM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling