+78.2%
AAPL vs PFG
+67.4%
+10.8%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -0.9% | +0.6% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -3.0% | +3.2% | -6.2% | -4.4% |
| 30D | +2.3% | +0.9% | +1.4% | +1.8% |
| 3M | +8.6% | +7.7% | +0.9% | +4.8% |
| 6M | +21.6% | +29.0% | -7.4% | +7.9% |
| YTD | +16.3% | +32.5% | -16.2% | +1.8% |
| 1Y | +35.1% | +47.3% | -12.3% | +12.2% |
| All | +78.2% | +67.4% | +10.8% | +43.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling