+2.9%
AAPL vs NIO
-33.7%
+36.6%
-11.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -1.6% | -1.0% | -2.4% |
| 7D | +0.1% | -13.0% | +13.1% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +3.0% | -18.3% | +21.3% | +4.3% |
| 3M | +2.9% | -33.2% | +36.1% | +8.7% |
| All | +2.9% | -33.7% | +36.6% | +8.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling