+78.2%
AAPL vs NEE
+34.9%
+43.3%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NEE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -1.4% | +1.1% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -3.0% | -0.5% | -2.4% | -2.9% |
| 30D | +2.3% | -1.7% | +4.0% | +2.5% |
| 3M | +8.6% | -1.8% | +10.5% | +8.8% |
| 6M | +21.6% | -8.8% | +30.4% | +22.5% |
| YTD | +16.3% | +5.2% | +11.1% | +15.5% |
| 1Y | +35.1% | +21.3% | +13.7% | +32.1% |
| All | +78.2% | +34.9% | +43.3% | +68.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NEE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NEE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NEE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NEE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling