+34.5%
AAPL vs NBIS
+1,581.9%
-1,547.5%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -1.4% | +1.2% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -3.0% | +17.8% | -20.7% | -3.4% |
| 30D | +2.3% | +30.5% | -28.3% | +1.2% |
| 3M | +8.6% | +9.2% | -0.6% | +7.5% |
| 6M | +21.6% | +153.2% | -131.6% | +14.6% |
| YTD | +16.3% | +187.1% | -170.8% | +8.5% |
| 1Y | +35.1% | +151.1% | -116.0% | +26.1% |
| All | +34.5% | +1,581.9% | -1,547.5% | +6.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling