+78.2%
AAPL vs GRMN
+179.1%
-100.9%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -1.3% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -3.0% | -1.4% | -1.6% | -2.7% |
| 30D | +2.3% | -13.1% | +15.4% | +5.5% |
| 3M | +8.6% | +14.9% | -6.3% | +4.4% |
| 6M | +21.6% | +13.1% | +8.4% | +17.0% |
| YTD | +16.3% | +35.3% | -19.0% | +6.5% |
| 1Y | +35.1% | +16.0% | +19.1% | +28.4% |
| All | +78.2% | +179.1% | -100.9% | +40.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling