+52.2%
AAPL vs GLXY
+12.0%
+40.1%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -0.6% | -1.9% | -2.5% |
| 7D | +0.1% | +13.4% | -13.4% | -0.1% |
| 30D | +3.0% | +38.1% | -35.1% | +2.3% |
| 3M | +2.9% | -7.3% | +10.2% | +3.1% |
| 6M | +22.1% | +8.2% | +13.9% | +21.2% |
| YTD | +18.0% | +17.8% | +0.3% | +16.3% |
| 1Y | +33.9% | +14.9% | +19.0% | +31.9% |
| All | +52.2% | +12.0% | +40.1% | +48.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling