+22.1%
AAPL vs DECK
-21.9%
+44.0%
-12.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | +1.6% | -4.1% | -2.9% |
| 7D | +0.1% | -2.2% | +2.3% | +0.6% |
| 30D | +3.0% | -13.6% | +16.6% | +6.7% |
| 3M | +2.9% | -21.2% | +24.1% | +8.5% |
| 6M | +22.1% | -21.1% | +43.2% | +28.5% |
| All | +22.1% | -21.9% | +44.0% | +28.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling