+78.2%
AAPL vs BLDR
-56.4%
+134.6%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -1.9% | +1.6% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -3.0% | -2.7% | -0.3% | -2.6% |
| 30D | +2.3% | -14.7% | +17.0% | +4.6% |
| 3M | +8.6% | -20.8% | +29.5% | +11.6% |
| 6M | +21.6% | -35.3% | +56.9% | +28.8% |
| YTD | +16.3% | -40.3% | +56.6% | +24.4% |
| 1Y | +35.1% | -56.3% | +91.3% | +52.7% |
| All | +78.2% | -56.4% | +134.6% | +93.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling