+84.5%
AAPL vs BIIB
-17.2%
+101.7%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.6% | +2.2% | +1.3% | +3.1% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -4.0% | +3.5% | +0.4% |
| 30D | +7.1% | +5.7% | +1.4% | +5.9% |
| 3M | +12.1% | +10.9% | +1.2% | +9.5% |
| 6M | +25.4% | +14.3% | +11.1% | +21.4% |
| YTD | +20.5% | +22.4% | -2.0% | +14.4% |
| 1Y | +44.5% | +51.1% | -6.5% | +29.8% |
| All | +84.5% | -17.2% | +101.7% | +69.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling