+786.6%
AAOI vs NIO
-65.5%
+852.2%
-77.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.3% | -3.2% | -1.1% | -2.9% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -7.3% | +10.2% | +6.3% |
| 30D | -23.1% | -22.5% | -0.6% | -14.1% |
| 3M | -41.0% | -30.9% | -10.1% | -30.8% |
| 6M | -14.3% | -37.2% | +22.9% | +5.5% |
| YTD | +196.3% | -29.8% | +226.1% | +246.4% |
| 1Y | +272.6% | -37.4% | +310.0% | +354.9% |
| All | +786.6% | -65.5% | +852.2% | +1,210.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling