+353.5%
AAOI vs LSCC
+99.6%
+253.9%
-79.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.6% | -5.5% | -0.1% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +7.0% | -7.5% | -6.3% |
| 30D | -42.1% | -2.3% | -39.8% | -40.2% |
| 3M | -61.6% | -12.5% | -49.1% | -55.0% |
| 6M | -77.6% | -10.6% | -67.1% | -73.8% |
| YTD | +43.1% | +52.7% | -9.6% | +5.7% |
| 1Y | +138.6% | +74.0% | +64.6% | +58.3% |
| 3Y | +353.5% | +104.8% | +248.8% | +113.6% |
| All | +353.5% | +99.6% | +253.9% | +113.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling