+804.4%
AAOI vs LNT
+46.9%
+757.5%
-77.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% | +2.0% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -1.0% | +0.9% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -23.7% | -4.2% | -19.5% | -22.9% |
| 3M | -39.0% | -6.7% | -32.3% | -38.5% |
| 6M | -17.0% | -3.6% | -13.5% | -17.2% |
| YTD | +202.2% | +5.9% | +196.4% | +194.4% |
| 1Y | +292.4% | +7.3% | +285.1% | +282.9% |
| 3Y | +804.4% | +46.5% | +757.9% | +682.8% |
| All | +804.4% | +46.9% | +757.5% | +682.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling