+826.4%
AAOI vs LDOS
+38.7%
+787.7%
-77.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | -0.9% | -2.4% | -2.9% |
| 7D | +4.7% | -4.2% | +8.9% | +6.2% |
| 30D | -18.7% | -7.9% | -10.9% | -16.6% |
| 3M | -33.7% | +4.1% | -37.8% | -34.9% |
| 6M | -2.4% | -28.2% | +25.8% | +14.9% |
| YTD | +209.6% | -28.5% | +238.2% | +260.3% |
| 1Y | +355.0% | -27.7% | +382.7% | +428.4% |
| All | +826.4% | +38.7% | +787.7% | +615.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling