+845.3%
AAOI vs GLDM
+126.1%
+719.3%
-77.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | -1.7% | +7.4% | +6.9% |
| 7D | +7.9% | +0.7% | +7.1% | +7.1% |
| 30D | -17.8% | +0.3% | -18.1% | -18.1% |
| 3M | -43.3% | +0.7% | -44.0% | -43.6% |
| 6M | +16.7% | -15.4% | +32.1% | +30.5% |
| YTD | +220.0% | +1.0% | +219.0% | +220.1% |
| 1Y | +372.1% | +19.7% | +352.3% | +330.7% |
| 3Y | +845.3% | +126.5% | +718.8% | +448.9% |
| All | +845.3% | +126.1% | +719.3% | +448.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling