+339.3%
AAOI vs GLDM
+107.8%
+231.4%
-79.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.3% | -2.6% | -4.6% | -5.2% |
| 7D | -24.5% | +2.9% | -27.3% | -26.5% |
| 30D | -55.9% | -3.9% | -52.0% | -54.4% |
| 3M | -63.6% | -8.1% | -55.5% | -61.0% |
| 6M | -67.6% | -14.7% | -52.9% | -63.3% |
| YTD | +38.6% | -6.6% | +45.2% | +47.2% |
| 1Y | +90.1% | -2.1% | +92.1% | +96.3% |
| All | +339.3% | +107.8% | +231.4% | +49.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling