+13.0%
AAL vs NIO
-59.9%
+72.9%
-51.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | +5.9% | -4.0% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +4.6% | +5.6% | -1.0% | +4.0% |
| 30D | +2.6% | -4.2% | +6.8% | +3.0% |
| 3M | -17.8% | -26.3% | +8.5% | -15.2% |
| 6M | +1.9% | -42.5% | +44.4% | +7.6% |
| YTD | -14.0% | -33.5% | +19.5% | -11.2% |
| 1Y | +0.2% | -52.7% | +52.9% | +7.5% |
| 3Y | +13.0% | -57.5% | +70.5% | +15.7% |
| All | +13.0% | -59.9% | +72.9% | +15.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling