-8.2%
AAL vs LII
+5.3%
-13.5%
-51.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +1.2% | +0.1% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -3.7% | -0.7% | -3.0% | -3.4% |
| 30D | -20.8% | -12.6% | -8.2% | -15.1% |
| 3M | -1.3% | -24.4% | +23.2% | +12.0% |
| 6M | +5.4% | -28.7% | +34.1% | +22.6% |
| YTD | -14.4% | -19.1% | +4.8% | -7.9% |
| 1Y | +2.1% | -29.7% | +31.8% | +18.3% |
| All | -8.2% | +5.3% | -13.5% | -21.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling