-8.2%
AAL vs LDOS
+39.7%
-47.9%
-51.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +0.5% | +0.7% | +1.1% |
| 7D | -3.7% | -5.4% | +1.7% | -2.5% |
| 30D | -20.8% | +4.9% | -25.7% | -21.9% |
| 3M | -1.3% | +7.2% | -8.5% | -3.2% |
| 6M | +5.4% | -24.2% | +29.6% | +14.0% |
| YTD | -14.4% | -25.8% | +11.5% | -6.9% |
| 1Y | +2.1% | -24.7% | +26.8% | +9.8% |
| All | -8.2% | +39.7% | -47.9% | -15.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling