-8.2%
AAL vs FITB
+128.4%
-136.6%
-51.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -0.2% | +1.4% | +1.4% |
| 7D | -3.7% | +0.6% | -4.3% | -4.2% |
| 30D | -20.8% | -4.7% | -16.1% | -17.8% |
| 3M | -1.3% | +6.7% | -8.0% | -6.1% |
| 6M | +5.4% | +12.6% | -7.2% | -4.2% |
| YTD | -14.4% | +19.1% | -33.5% | -25.6% |
| 1Y | +2.1% | +22.6% | -20.5% | -13.7% |
| All | -8.2% | +128.4% | -136.6% | -47.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling