+13.0%
AAL vs BLDR
-51.2%
+64.1%
-51.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.6% | -3.6% | -2.0% | -4.0% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -8.2% | +11.2% | +6.9% |
| 30D | +6.5% | +16.3% | -9.8% | -1.0% |
| 3M | -10.9% | -17.0% | +6.1% | -4.1% |
| 6M | +4.9% | -17.4% | +22.3% | +12.5% |
| YTD | -13.2% | -41.6% | +28.4% | +6.6% |
| 1Y | -1.1% | -43.5% | +42.4% | +22.7% |
| All | +13.0% | -51.2% | +64.1% | +44.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling