+70.7%
AA vs NIO
-64.6%
+135.2%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -1.6% | -0.6% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -0.7% | -13.0% | +12.3% | +2.5% |
| 30D | +5.0% | -18.3% | +23.3% | +9.9% |
| 3M | -35.8% | -33.2% | -2.6% | -29.7% |
| 6M | -18.4% | -21.5% | +3.1% | -15.1% |
| YTD | -5.5% | -25.5% | +20.0% | -1.0% |
| 1Y | +61.0% | -38.0% | +99.0% | +74.6% |
| All | +70.7% | -64.6% | +135.2% | +114.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling