+50.8%
AA vs MSTZ
-99.2%
+149.9%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | +5.5% | -7.4% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -23.6% | +22.9% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -1.6% | -60.7% | +59.2% | -6.9% |
| 3M | -29.8% | -58.3% | +28.4% | -32.0% |
| 6M | -16.6% | -60.0% | +43.4% | -18.3% |
| YTD | -4.0% | -75.2% | +71.2% | -6.2% |
| 1Y | +63.5% | -19.9% | +83.4% | +82.8% |
| All | +50.8% | -99.2% | +149.9% | +26.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling