-49.6%
ZTS vs UMC
+209.4%
-259.0%
-52.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +4.6% | -5.2% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -2.0% | +5.0% | -6.9% | -1.9% |
| 30D | +1.9% | +7.7% | -5.8% | +2.0% |
| 3M | -4.0% | +1.7% | -5.7% | -4.7% |
| 6M | -39.1% | +113.9% | -153.1% | -42.5% |
| YTD | -38.8% | +168.9% | -207.7% | -42.2% |
| 1Y | -49.6% | +207.2% | -256.8% | -51.6% |
| All | -49.6% | +209.4% | -259.0% | -51.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling