-49.6%
ZTS vs PFGC
-5.1%
-44.5%
-52.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -0.5% | -0.1% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -2.2% | +0.2% | -1.6% |
| 30D | +1.9% | -11.9% | +13.8% | +4.1% |
| 3M | -4.0% | +5.0% | -9.0% | -4.5% |
| 6M | -39.1% | +8.6% | -47.7% | -40.2% |
| YTD | -38.8% | +9.7% | -48.5% | -41.2% |
| 1Y | -49.6% | -6.3% | -43.3% | -49.1% |
| All | -49.6% | -5.1% | -44.5% | -49.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling