-49.6%
ZTS vs GLDM
+24.7%
-74.3%
-52.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -0.9% | +0.3% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -0.5% | -1.4% | -2.0% |
| 30D | +1.9% | +4.4% | -2.5% | +1.8% |
| 3M | -4.0% | -1.1% | -2.9% | -3.7% |
| 6M | -39.1% | -13.7% | -25.5% | -38.3% |
| YTD | -38.8% | +2.8% | -41.6% | -40.4% |
| 1Y | -49.6% | +24.8% | -74.4% | -51.7% |
| All | -49.6% | +24.7% | -74.3% | -51.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling