-49.6%
ZTS vs BBIO
+44.0%
-93.6%
-52.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -0.8% | +0.1% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -2.3% | +0.3% | -1.9% |
| 30D | +1.9% | -8.7% | +10.6% | +2.4% |
| 3M | -4.0% | +11.2% | -15.2% | -5.3% |
| 6M | -39.1% | +12.5% | -51.6% | -39.8% |
| YTD | -38.8% | -2.2% | -36.6% | -39.5% |
| 1Y | -49.6% | +44.4% | -94.0% | -52.3% |
| All | -49.6% | +44.0% | -93.6% | -52.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling