+22.4%
ZM vs VICR
+272.1%
-249.7%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | VICR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | +5.5% | -2.2% | +3.3% |
| 7D | +2.9% | +0.4% | +2.5% | +2.9% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -13.9% | +14.6% | +0.5% |
| 3M | -3.7% | -38.4% | +34.7% | -4.0% |
| 6M | +29.9% | -7.2% | +37.1% | +28.2% |
| YTD | +17.4% | +72.0% | -54.6% | +12.3% |
| 1Y | +22.4% | +263.3% | -240.9% | +13.5% |
| All | +22.4% | +272.1% | -249.7% | +13.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VICR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VICR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VICR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VICR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling