+22.4%
ZM vs TXG
+372.5%
-350.1%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TXG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | -0.9% | +4.2% | +3.3% |
| 7D | +2.9% | +1.8% | +1.1% | +2.9% |
| 30D | +0.7% | +32.0% | -31.3% | +0.6% |
| 3M | -3.7% | +87.0% | -90.7% | -3.6% |
| 6M | +29.9% | +180.1% | -150.2% | +30.3% |
| YTD | +17.4% | +284.1% | -266.7% | +16.6% |
| 1Y | +22.4% | +361.7% | -339.3% | +16.9% |
| All | +22.4% | +372.5% | -350.1% | +16.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TXG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TXG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TXG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TXG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling