+22.4%
ZM vs SPXS
-40.2%
+62.6%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | SPXS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | +1.3% | +2.0% | +3.6% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -0.1% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| 30D | +0.7% | +0.8% | -0.1% | +1.1% |
| 3M | -3.7% | -4.7% | +1.0% | -3.8% |
| 6M | +29.9% | -29.6% | +59.5% | +20.1% |
| YTD | +17.4% | -29.8% | +47.2% | +9.4% |
| 1Y | +22.4% | -38.9% | +61.3% | +16.1% |
| All | +22.4% | -40.2% | +62.6% | +16.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SPXS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SPXS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SPXS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SPXS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling