+9.6%
ZM vs PENG
+120.5%
-110.9%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -9.1% | +9.1% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -8.4% | -20.5% | +12.1% | -6.7% |
| 30D | -1.9% | -20.4% | +18.5% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -10.1% | -16.4% | +6.3% | -9.2% |
| 6M | -13.9% | +49.2% | -63.1% | -23.2% |
| YTD | +6.4% | +147.2% | -140.8% | -13.4% |
| 1Y | +9.6% | +124.7% | -115.1% | -9.5% |
| All | +9.6% | +120.5% | -110.9% | -9.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling