+22.4%
ZM vs LPLA
+0.7%
+21.7%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | -0.3% | +3.6% | +3.3% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -3.1% | +6.0% | +3.6% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -0.1% | +0.8% | +0.7% |
| 3M | -3.7% | +23.2% | -26.9% | -7.6% |
| 6M | +29.9% | +15.5% | +14.3% | +26.0% |
| YTD | +17.4% | +0.9% | +16.5% | +16.7% |
| 1Y | +22.4% | +0.2% | +22.2% | +20.7% |
| All | +22.4% | +0.7% | +21.7% | +20.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling