+9.6%
ZM vs EOSE
-85.5%
+95.0%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOSE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +12.6% | -12.6% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -8.4% | +9.7% | -18.1% | -9.3% |
| 30D | -1.9% | -34.6% | +32.7% | +1.5% |
| 3M | -10.1% | -50.8% | +40.7% | -5.1% |
| 6M | -13.9% | -66.5% | +52.6% | -7.1% |
| YTD | +6.4% | -81.3% | +87.8% | +19.8% |
| 1Y | +9.6% | -84.8% | +94.4% | +25.0% |
| All | +9.6% | -85.5% | +95.0% | +25.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOSE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOSE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOSE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOSE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling