+22.4%
ZM vs CLBK
+73.3%
-50.9%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | 0.0% | +3.3% | +3.3% |
| 7D | +2.9% | +1.2% | +1.7% | +2.7% |
| 30D | +0.7% | +9.1% | -8.4% | -1.1% |
| 3M | -3.7% | +27.7% | -31.4% | -9.2% |
| 6M | +29.9% | +40.8% | -11.0% | +19.4% |
| YTD | +17.4% | +66.4% | -49.0% | +3.7% |
| 1Y | +22.4% | +72.4% | -50.0% | +7.4% |
| All | +22.4% | +73.3% | -50.9% | +7.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling