+9.9%
ZM vs BRKR
+62.4%
-52.5%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BRKR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +12.9% | -12.9% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -8.4% | +2.9% | -11.3% | -8.4% |
| 30D | -1.9% | -0.1% | -1.8% | -2.2% |
| 3M | -10.1% | +26.9% | -37.0% | -9.4% |
| 6M | -13.9% | +75.6% | -89.5% | -15.1% |
| YTD | +6.4% | +35.8% | -29.4% | +5.9% |
| All | +9.9% | +62.4% | -52.5% | +1.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BRKR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BRKR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BRKR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BRKR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling